On a recent short trip I travelled “hand baggage only”. I threw in my travel washbag without even thinking about the contents, as it would have had what it had in for the last trip. However, it usually goes into the checked baggage.
As I stood beltless and shoeless waiting for my rucksack to come through the X-ray machine, I felt a sudden icy chill at the realisation that I had a pair of scissors in the bag. Full-size, not nail scissors, and with a sharp 4-5 inch blade. Don’t ask me why they live in the washbag; I have no use for them.
The bag was pulled to one side and a very stern man asked me if he could search it. Really he was telling me that he was going to search it. He pulled out the washbag, and undid the clip. The scissors were in a closed section inside. In another section with a clear plastic screen was a jar of hairstyling wax (almost as redundant as the scissors in my case).
He jabbed a finger at the offensive container and looked me in the eye.
“What’s this? Hair wax?”
“That’s why you’ve been stopped today. Any liquid, gel or wax should go into the clear plastic bag.”
“I’m terribly sorry.”
He shook his head wearily and folded up the washbag, returning it to me with the other contents for me to repack.
So, less embarrassing than it might have been. However, it’s hard to see the point of the endless queues etc given that (a) undeclared liquids and gels are not even examined and (b) the X-ray machine can’t even spot a pair of scissors.
This was on the way back, too, so they’d missed both of them on the way out…
I’ve been experimenting with Fargo (http://fargo.io). It’s clearly very clever, while also being very simple.
It’s a highly configurable, highly connected outliner
I’m using it for note-taking and planning, but as it also has one-click WordPress publishing built in I’ve connected it to my old blog, and am publishing again. There may be lots of test posts here now!
I took a few random tests as a user on all three of the sites listed. The interface was fine, I was motivated to try a few more tests and it seemed as though it would give good feedback to designers, provided they had asked the right questions and kept their tests simple.
It was occasionally slow to the point of hanging when requesting a new test, the number of tests was not as high as I would have expected, and on occasion I was given a test I’d seen before.
There are paid options, but users can get access to testing services by acquiring ‘karma points’, obtained from testing other sites
You learn as much by looking at other people’s tests as you do by testing your own material, in my opinion
Looking at a Sitemaps page in Webmaster Tools with more than 100m pages submitted… quite scary.
Still getting some odd "link removal" requests. I've had two from one agency (different people) including one from an "Off Page Strategist". The first time, a colleague called and was told to "forget it". The second time I emailed them asking why, and haven't had a reply.I still can't work out whether they are idiots (removing their own clients' links) or bastards (requesting removal of clients' competitors' links)…
Still getting some odd "link removal" requests. I've had two from one agency (different people) including one from an "Off Page Strategist". The first time, a colleague called and was told to "forget it". The second time I emailed them asking why, and haven't had a reply.
I still can't work out whether they are idiots (removing their own clients' links) or bastards (requesting removal of clients' competitors' links)…